In Colombia they regret the fact that they did not get three points from their visit to La Paz, while in Bolivia they complain about the arbitration … Did they harm the local?
The Bolivian coach, César Farías, regretted that La Verde could not go from a draw to one at home against Colombia and attributed the result to arbitration, which in his opinion did not charge a penalty in favor of the locals, which changed the game for full.
The disputed play came after a Bolivian corner kick and an apparent hand from Colombian William Tesillo that Venezuelan judge Alexis Hererra missed near the end of the first half.
At a press conference, Farías said that after reviewing the images of the match, he was able to confirm that “it was a hand, it was a penalty and that completely modified the game.” The Venezuelan strategist deplored that his compatriot “did not even” want to review the VAR at that time and assured that he claimed it because “sometimes we do not measure with equality and arbitration is for equality.”
Farías thanked the people who encouraged the Green from the stands of the Hernando Siles stadium and maintained that he has “nothing to recriminate” his team, who had “greater possession of the ball” and maintained their balance despite the goal received in the minute 69.
“We have grown in the game, we have been adding four dates of the tie, we wanted more, we want more, but also unfortunately not reviewing the VAR did not give us the possibility of having a better result,” he insisted.
The annoyance is such that with the above on the table, it is foreseeable that the president of the Bolivian Football Federation (FBF), Fernando Costa, will raise the corresponding “complaints” because both the squad and the local leaders feel they were “harmed” .
“I just spoke with the president of the FBF and he is going to raise complaints. There are several members of the FBF and we all feel that we were harmed “, said the helmsman.
.