Colombia vs. Brazil
Refereeing experts, journalists and former footballers join the discussion.
Find the validation of El Cazamentiras at the end of the news.
Much debate has been generated around the controversial action in the match between Brazil and Colombia, which meant Brazil’s first goal and partial draw against Colombia, which in the end ended up losing its Copa América match.
(You may be interested in: This is the rule by which the Brazilian goal is valid)
Different soccer personalities discuss and give arguments about the annotation that the center-back validated, after the ball hit his body.
“It cannot be that a referee and others in the VAR cannot see that when the ball hits the judge and influences the behavior of the players, it should be stopped and invalidated. Very bad @CONMEBOL,” said the referee analyst Rafael Sanabria.
“The Pitana thing is a shame, what a shame for Colombia!”, The ex-footballer trilled Ivan Zamorano.
“When the ball hits the referee … the game must be cut off if the ball changes possession of the team … or generates a clear goal opportunity … Pitana’s terrible location but the ball goes to the point and the possession belongs to the same team”, wrote former international referee Javier Castrili.
Pitana’s thing is a shame, what a shame for Colombia !!
– Iván Zamorano (@ bambam9oficial) June 24, 2021
It cannot be that a referee and others in the VAR, cannot see that when the ball hits the judge and influences the behavior of the players, it must be stopped and invalidated. Very bad @CONMEBOL
– RAFA SANABRIA (@ rafasanabria13) June 24, 2021
There is the regulation. For me, after the rebound in Pitana, a promising attack by Brazil begins, with a man who is alone to launch a cross that ends in a goal. And partly, in addition, he is alone because Pita looks down and starts to collect. pic.twitter.com/0UKBMv382n
– Diego Borinsky (@diegoborinsky) June 24, 2021
When the ball hits the referee … the game must be stopped if the ball changes possession of the team … or generates a clear goal opportunity … Pitana’s terrible location but the ball goes to the point and the possession belongs to the same team …
– Javier Castrilli (@castrillijavier) June 24, 2021
The lesson is very clear: the regulatory modification is ambiguous and leaves the decision to the referee. They would have to legislate that every ball that hits the judge is thrown. Do not let the judges “interpret”. Always in favor of the powerful.
– Iván Mejía Álvarez (@PajaritoDeIvan) June 24, 2021
SPORTS
More sports news
–Video: Brazil vs. Colombia: see Luis Díaz’s goal, a jewel
–Jhon Mario Ramírez fights against covid-19 and will not lead Patriotas
–Martin Dúbravka: rude mistake in Slovakia vs. Spain
Keep going down
to find more content
You got to content limit of the month
Enjoy the content of THE DIGITAL TIME unlimitedly. Subscribe now!
* COP $ 900 / month during the first two months
We know that you like to always be informed.
Create an account and you can enjoy:
- Access to newsletters with the best current news.
- Comment the news that interests you.
- Keep your favorite items.
Create an account and you can enjoy our content from any device.