Lintensity, hunger and rhythm were conspicuous by their absence in the Olympic stadium Pedro Ludovico Teixeira of Goiania. Neither Venezuela neither Colombia jumped into the green with the intention of subduing their rival. Nor did the set of Reinaldo Rueda. After a few first measures of scoring and without competitive tension, the chances began to arrive. Colombia enjoyed up to two very clear set pieces. Uribe first and Mine later, they missed the goal.
The ‘coffee’ combined gave the initiative to Venezuela. Cardona was the first to meet a wall called Fariez. Robbery of Muriel at the ball exit to finish connecting with the ’10’. Before dribbling inward, his low shot was brought out with a great stretch by the goalkeeper. With Square going unnoticed, Zapata’s power It was an important asset when it came to generating chances. Not even three players were able to stop the ram, but if Fariez. An auction of Aristeguieta what did i avoid Davinson sanchez, and some other approach by band was the poor offensive baggage of Venezuela that managed to reach the break with the tie on the scoreboard.
After the break, Colombia took a step forward and I left determined to solve the meeting. I tried mainly by means of lateral centers in which neither Mina nor Zapata were able to finish between the three sticks. In the second act, Cuadrado took over from Cardona which was replaced. Better from the hand of the extreme the ‘coffee’ selection, but the Venezuelan bloc stops all offensive. He had the best Uribe in a masterpiece in the form of a Chilean. But ah once again the figure of Farez appeared.
From then on, the game became dirty and between tension and impotence, things stopped happening in the areas. He was about to take advantage of some against Venezuela, but he never got to realize chances in front of the goal that Ospina defended. Distribution of points for both selections it has better flavor for those of Jos Peseiro.