What did the national arbitration board say about Rojo’s expulsion?

The early expulsion of Marcos Rojo At 16 minutes into the superclassic he gave and will give something to talk about, because of the way he conditioned the rest of the River-Boca. The referee Fernando Rapallini He did not refer to it for the moment, but he did this Monday the National Director of Arbitration, Federico Beligoy, with some considerations that did not completely bank the judge of the match.

Look also

Look also

Leo Messi, in a special edition of Olé!

“We have had a classic, I think in recent years it has been the least controversial classicObviously, we did not have to go around observing or justifying or reviewing controversial plays within the areas, for example, so I think that is positive and we are not having a big discussion today, “Beligoy started.

“Yes, obviously there is Marcos Rojo’s play where we we have enough considerations to be able to bear that decision But obviously one spent 30 years on the playing field, spent many years in the First Division, for 15 years directing, and We know that there is a temperature and a thermometer, that obviously is a question that we are going to talk to Fernando about promptly., but clearly there are considerations that support Fernando’s decision ”.

Half approved

Red saw the first yellow for a sliding tackle Braian Romero, even though he retracted his legs at the last minute. And the second came a minute later by a crash with the body to Palavecino that it was not for another card. But it was, in a hasty and exaggerated decision, according to the analysis of Ole.

Rapallini rushed in for the second yellow card. They were 16 minutes.

Rapallini rushed in for the second yellow card. They were 16 minutes.

With temperature and thermometer, Beligoy suggests with a planning of the match made in the previous one by the National Arbitration Directorate, in which there was no possibility of distorting such an important match setting the high bar of discipline.

That is to say, the refereeing director considered that Rapallini was legally endorsed, but at the same time clarified: “Then there are questions that we analyze indoors, that we can have different views or be able to discuss this play in order to have a little more extensive learning when it comes to directing these important games”.

Look also

The controversial gestures of Pulpo González and Cardona

“There are considerations to support the decision and that is very clear. Now, later, obviously there are a lot of indoor issues that we analyze and prepare and when we do the projection and planning of the game, they touch, talk and settle down, and after the game, which we have not done yet, we do it. we are going to do between today or tomorrow, there is going to be that return of the planning that we are going to tell Fernando what we believe and what we think ”.

Look also

Boca was not Boca: the changes and the lack of reaction

Later, former judge Beligoy did not want to comment on whether or not he had expelled Rojo. “The referee was Fernando Rapallini, I was not the referee of the match and the decision was made by him. And we respect it and I repeat there is a match planning and a match return planning. When we have the planning for the return of the game, we will tell him what we think“, he completed on TyC Sports.

Rapallini rushed in for the second yellow card. They were 16 minutes.

Rapallini rushed in for the second yellow card. They were 16 minutes.

.