Sergio Ramos loses his battle in court with Fran Rivera

ANDhe Supreme Court (TS) has given the reason to the bullfighter Frank Rivera in a litigation that keeps from 2013 with the Pars Saint Germain footballer Sergio Ramosafter the award to a company of the diestro the management of a gourmet market in Seville against which the player appealed when considering that It was not done in accordance with the law.

As you have advanced Seville Journal and is collected in the providence to which he has had access EFEthe first section of the contentious-administrative chamber of the high court does not admit the appeal presented by the footballer against a sentence of the Superior Court of Justice of Andalusia (TSJA), which in July 2020 agreed with the bullfighter.

Origin of the dispute between Sergio Ramos and Fran Rivera

The judicial fight has its origin in a decision of histo the governing board of the Seville City Council in 2012when he granted the management of the gourmet market ‘The market of the ravine‘ to one Temporary Union of Companies (UTE) participated by the bullfighter, while another participated by the soccer player was left out, but resorted to understanding that the winner did not have proven solvency for management.

‘The fish market of the ravine’ in Seville

In his brief he alluded to the fact that he had debts with the public administration, although he was granted management for 25 years and with an annual fee of 250,000 euros.

On july 2020andl TSJA dismissed the appeal filed by the soccer player’s companyconsidering that the UTE Mercado de San Pedro, that of Fran Rivera, submitted its offer in accordance with the specifications of the samewhile that of the player, Sermos 32, had not been able to prove the alleged irregularity in the Declaration on debts with Social Security that it alludes to as the basis of the appeal.

Ramos’ appeal “was not sufficiently grounded”

For the Supreme Court, Sergio Ramos’ appeal “not sufficiently substantiated“, and emphasizes that the “problem underlying the lawsuit is related to an evidentiary issue linked to the deferral of the tax debt, which the Chamber of Seville has resolved unfavorably to the interests of the appellantconcluding that there is no such prohibition of contracting in view of the documentation provided”.

1647522122 547 Sergio Ramos loses his battle in court with Fran Rivera

The inadmissibility of the appeal also entails the Imposition of procedural costs to the footballer for a maximum amount of 1,000 euros plus taxes.

We want to thank the author of this post for this incredible material

Sergio Ramos loses his battle in court with Fran Rivera