Pumas analyzes protesting refereeing of the semifinal back against Atlas; they want to set a precedent

The university club appealed the red card to Juan Dinenno in the semifinal against Atlas, in addition to raising their voices for the controversial play in the area against their forward

Upon removal of Pumas at the hands of Atlas in the semifinals of Opening 2021, the university board analyzes protesting the arbitration of Jorge Antonio Pérez Durán, who did not score a penalty in favor of the team in a play in which the forward was injured in the nose Juan Ignacio Dinenno.

It is a fact that Pumas feels harmed by the arbitration decision that, despite having passed the action by the VAR, it was determined that there was no faultContrary to what many eyes saw near the end of the semi-final round at the Jalisco Stadium on Sunday.

The high command chaired by Leopoldo Silva, along with Vice President Miguel Mejía Barón, tries to see how convenient it is to present the issue before the respective authorities of the MX League and the Referees Commission itself, something that would only remain as a precedent; It would be sought that errors of that size do not happen again in the Mexican tournament, much less in a league, a phase in which the title is played.

In addition to this, the Mexican Soccer Federation announced that Pumas asked to review Dinenno’s expulsion so that the organism determines if the red card is maintained and the start of the Clausura 2022 is lost.

So far, the Auriazul leadership has no plans to make its position known to the press.

Pumas was left out of the big party despite having won 0-1 against the rojinegros since the Guadalajara team appealed to their best position in the table and their victory in the first leg by the smallest difference.

.

We would love to thank the author of this short article for this remarkable content

Pumas analyzes protesting refereeing of the semifinal back against Atlas; they want to set a precedent