Villa case: quoted the same day that Boca plays, what can happen?

“Sign audience for Friday June 24 from the current at 10:30 a.m. so that the accused appear before the stands of this Prosecutor’s Office to give a statementThus, the Justice of the province of Buenos Aires summoned Sebastian Villa to give his investigative statement in the framework of the case for the complaint of “sexual abuse with carnal access” by Tamara Doldán. the same day that Mouth receives Union of Santa Fe in the Bombonera, for the fifth date of the Professional League. What can happen?

Although football may remain in the background in the middle of a legal case classified as sexual abuse, if necessary Villa’s defense commanded by the lawyer Martin Apollo could get to ask for the postponement of the summons before the deputy prosecutor Vanesa González, as indicated to Ole.

What the Football Council and Villa will have to define is what is most convenient, since surely on Friday the 24th against Unión a very alternative formation will play and perhaps they prefer to comply once and for all with that summons, taking into account that the Libertadores round of 16 series is coming up against Corinthians. And that is the true goal of Boca this year.

Villa is also the great figure of this Boca, the most unbalanced player in Battaglia’s squad. And regardless of the open causes and despite the differences that existed in the club in respect, the leadership decided not to take any disciplinary action while there is no resolution in Justice.

The Colombian striker was summoned for questioning after a few days of uncertainty due to the arrest request made by the Prosecutor’s Office that days later was rejected by Judge Javier Maffucci Moore and that the date that will take place be confirmed for September the oral trial for the cause of “minor injuries” started in 2020 by his former partner Daniela Cortés.

How does this cause

Previously, although Doldán’s psychiatric expertise was overwhelming due to the indicators of sexual abuse that he presented (anguish, post-traumatic stress, disorders), later four witnesses summoned to testify strongly contradicted much of what the woman said in confirming the complaint.

First was the gynecologist and then the resident who treated her in the Penna hospital ward. If they had confirmed what was reported, she would only be talking about when the Colombian would be imprisoned, but the doctor did not even remember having treated the girl and said that she could only mention what she had recorded in the duty book, where did not mention injuries consistent with sexual abuse.

In the complaint, the woman had stated that two agents were at the gate of the country aboard a patrol car after a 911 call. But both said they did not remember going to the place (“It could be”, “I don’t remember”, “maybe yes, maybe no”) and, at the same time, a report from the Buenos Aires Ministry of Security revealed that there was no emergency call.

In turn, in the psychiatric examination carried out on Villa two weeks ago, they determined that “does not present psychiatric pathology or mental disorders” and “does not suffer from any illness or mental disorder”, which was favorable to the Colombian.